top of page

Groups Feed

View groups and posts below.


This post is from a suggested group

David Davis in Parliament today

Today in Parliament, David Davis raised concerns about the way Cheshire Police handled the Lucy Letby case, questioning their decisions and oversight in a case that has already shaken public trust.


In response, Sarah Jones defended the police, saying they followed procedure and that the public shouldn’t lose faith in them.


This is exactly the problem. Reassuring people that procedure was followed doesn’t fix anything. Trust would be far better restored if the police had the decency to own their mistakes and put them right. Without that, it’s hard to believe that, if another innocent person were ever caught up in a serious error, the priority would be to make it right rather than to save face.

I've written to Sarah Jones about this, her email is sarah.jones.mp@parliament.uk

If anyone else wants to as well

290 Views

This post is from a suggested group

Lucy Update

Does anyone have any current news about the CCRC decision? I'm not enjoying the silence so I thought I'd open the conversation.


Richard Gill recently posted the removed RCPCH report pages, in case you haven't seen them, here they are


630 Views
Liz
Liz
Jan 17

https://archive.ph/2WI9W


From today’s Sun (of all papers!) I’m hoping that their reference to Lucy as the’so-called Angel of death’ might signify a change in their collective attitude, unless I’m reading it incorrectly.

This post is from a suggested group

Welcome to our group The Justice System! A space for us to connect and share with each other. Start by posting your thoughts, sharing media, or creating a poll.

3177 Views
Bruce
Bruce
Jul 25

Letter in the DT online today (Sat 25 July 2026)…


Letby medical defence


SIR – As a retired consultant obstetrician and maternity hospital chief executive, I find it very difficult to comprehend why the maternity notes were not made available to Lucy Letby’s original defence team (“Letby baby died from birth trauma, medical expert claims”, report, July 22). 

Every student midwife and medical student is taught that the condition of a baby at birth and shortly afterwards is highly dependent on the antecedent pregnancy, labour and delivery. Every neonatologist, paediatrician and neonatal nurse knows this, too. I imagine that every trainee solicitor and barrister is also made aware of it as part of their medical negligence education. 

That maternity factors were not taken into consideration in Letby’s defence, in itself, justifies the calls for a retrial. 

Chris Fitzpatrick

Dublin, Ireland

This post is from a suggested group

Welcome to our group Chimp Investor Group! A space for us to connect and share with each other. Start by posting your thoughts, sharing media, or creating a poll.

634 Views
Receive posts direct from The Chimp by email

Note: subscription to emails is not the same as membership of the site. In addition to emails, membership allows the posting of comments etc.  The membership area is here.

Thanks for subscribing!

CONTACT

I am based in London. I will see any comments you append to posts, be thankful for them, and may very well respond to them, but if you’d like to contact me directly click here.

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter Basic Black
  • RSS
Chimp Investor logo

© 2022 by Chimp Investor

bottom of page